Student #1 |
Males and females should not be seperated
into different math and science classes. Seperating
males and females because of a percieved difference
in ability in math and science classes will make women
feel inferior and will contribute to the stereotyope.
Also, interaction between males and females can help
students learn the subject matter and learn important
life skills. Although women have been labeled as less
inclined to excel in math and science, this has not
been proven, and it is just a common steryotype. Some
worry that males and females may be distracted when
they are together, but if males and females are put
together in other classes, why should math and science
classes be any different?
Placing females and males in seperate classes would
make women feel inferior. If women knew that they were
not seen as fit to be in the same classes as males,
then they might actually believe that they are not smart
in math and science. If females believe this, then they
will be less motivated and their performance in these
subjects will decline. This could also discourage females
from entering feilds of study that involve math and
science. With the many problems in our world today,
including global warming and limited enery sources,
we need as many scientists and engineers as possible,
women included. Some believe that women and men have
such different levels of intelligence in math and science
that they are not fit to be in the same classes. I know
from personal experience that the difference between
male and female students is barely noticeable. There
are plenty of female students in the honors math and
science courses that I take, and many female students
excel just as much, if not more, than male students.
Seperating math and science classes by gender would
reduce the amount of interaction between males and females.
This is detrimental academically and socially. Interaction
between students is integral to the learning process.
Students are able to ask each other questions and work
together to better understand what is being taught.
Teachers are often not able to explain certain concepts
as well as other students. If males and females were
sperarated, they would not be able to help each other
learn. If males are really brighter in math and science,
then wouldn't it be good for males to help struggeling
female students? Also, female and male interaction is
important in school, because in the working world, males
and females need to be able to work together in order
to successfully contribute to society. Some argue that
males and females are more easily distracted when they
are together. However, males and females can successfully
learn in other classes, like enlish and history, without
becoming too dsitracted. Science and math classes are
no different.
Our society has come along way since the days that
women had no voting rights because they were thought
to be too unintelligent. However,seperating women and
men into different math and science classes would be
a step backward for society. Women have shown that they
are just as intelligent as men, even though the stereotype
that men are brighter in math and science does still
exist. Seperate math and science classes would make
women feel that they are of inferior intelligence and
would lower their performances in those subjects. Also
the seperation would limit the amount of interaction
and collaboration between males and females, leaving
both sexes unprepared for the real world. |
Comments & Final Grade
This is a beautiful essay. It is well organized, its
thesis is clear, and its argument is supported by three
logical reasons. A specific example that illustrates
the argument that females will under-perform in science
if they believe to be ill-suited for this field would
be nice. In the context of the time and space restrictions
of the ACT, the length of the essay is somewhat of concern.
The conclusion provides a lot of repetitive information
that could be deleted without altering the essay's content.
The argument that males and females need each other
to learn academically is weak (are women who attended
all-girls schools less successful?) and it plays partially
on the opposing point of view that the scientifically
challenged females need the help of their male peers
to master the material in question. To cite English
instruction as an example of males and females successfully
learning in a coed environment is not a very smart choice
since females frequently outperform males in English.
One of your arguments is that students are gender-integrated
in other classes, and so "why should math and science
be any different?" but the prompt mentions the prospect
of separating (note the spelling, by the way) students
in classes SUCH AS math and science; in other words,
other courses would be considered fair game for such
a switch. Other than that, you are thorough in your
addressing of opposing arguments, which is good. (How
about the flipside to math and science, though? How
do you feel about boys excelling in English, history,
and foreign languages?) In addition of "separated,"
other proper spellings include "fields," "energy," "struggling,"
"English" (capital "E"), and "distracted." (I do realize
that many of these are probably not real spelling errors
but rather typographical ones, which, of course, you
won't have to worry about while writing your essay out
by hand.)
This essay received a 5 from one grader, a 4 from the
other for a total score of 9. |
|
Student #2 |
Taking classes with the opposite sex
can be very difficult and unnerving for students during
their teenage years. It is more important for one to
focus on math class rather than worring about whether
they look good. Single sex environments are the best
way to focus and do well in school, however, it might
not be the best move for the long run.
Single sex schools are beneficial for those who are
not mature or controlled enough to have classes with
the opposite sex. These students are able to focus more
on their studies with less distractions. Also, by taking
classes with all boys or all girls, there is less competition
between the sexes to prove which sex is the smarter.
Instead, there is friendly competition. However, boys
and girls still need interaction of some sort with the
opposite sex. Without this interaction the real world
will be a complete shock. This is because instead of
only competeing with others of the same sex who think
in the same fashion as oneself, there are co-workers
of the opposite sex who think rather differently. In
order to make this impact less noticeable as an adult
continuing some interaction between teenagers while
as school is a neccessity.
Thus, single sex classes are successful to a certain
extent. It is a sufficient way of limitating distractions
caused by the opposite sex, however, boys and girls
should not be completely seperated. By having more complex
and competitive classes seperated, students might do
better in classes. |
Comments & Final Grade
Despite its flaws, we liked this essay overall, because
it takes a stance (girls and boys should be separated
in complex classes), but qualifies it by saying the
sexes should still interact to prepare teens for the
"real world." However, where you may have gone astray
was that you interpreted the prompt to mean that there
should be separate schools for girls and boys, but the
prompt just asks if educators should create separate
classes (within the same school). So the comments about
single-sex schools seem "off" and we're not sure about
the idea that those who attend such schools are "not
mature or controlled enough to have classes with the
opposite sex," nor do we think the only female concern
is whether "they look good." They may fear appearing
too dumb or too smart, for example. And do you really
think all females think alike and that there is only
"friendly competition" among them? You have strong ideas,
but in these tests they generally want you to come down
on one side or the other. While we think you have done
that "not the best move in the long run," the reader
might see you making too many points in defense of the
other view. Don't eliminate them entirely -- they like
to see you address the other view -- but use a few more
sentences to defend your main idea. We'd make it a semicolon
right before "however" in the first paragraph and replace
"less" with "fewer" in the second sentence of the second
paragraph. You drop one "e" for "competing" and you
use an "a" for "separated." "For the long run" should
be "in the long run."
This essay received a 3 from one grader, a 4 from the
other for a total score of 7. |
|